BioLuminate References

1.

Olsson, M. H. M.; Søndergard, C. R.; Rostkowski, M.; Jensen J. H. PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa predictions. J. Chem. Theor. Comput., 2011, 7, 525–537.

2.

North, B.; Lehmann, A.; Dunbrack, R. L., Jr. A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 406, 228.

3.

Comeau, S. R.; Gatchell, D. W.; Vajda, S.; Camacho, C. J. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 45–50.

4.

Comeau, S. R.; Gatchell, D. W.; Vajda, S.; Camacho, C. J. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein–protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W96–W99.

5.

Kozakov, D.; Brenke, R.; Comeau, S. R.; Vajda, S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006, 65, 392–406.

6.

Kyte, J.; Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 157, 105–132.

7.

Hellberg, S.; Sjöström, M.; Skagerberg, B.; Wold, S. Peptide quantitative structure-activity relationships, a multivariate approach. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 1126.

8.

Sandberg, M.; Eriksson, L.; Jonsson J.; Sjöström, M.; Wold, S. New chemical descriptors relevant for the design of biologically active peptides. A multivariate characterization of 87 amino acids. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2481.

9.

Tian, F.; Lv, F.; Zhou, P.; Yang, Q.; Jalbout, A. F. Toward prediction of binding affinities between the MHC protein and its peptide ligands using quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach. Protein Pept. Lett. 2008, 15, 1033.

10.

Lawrence, M. C.; Colman, P. M. J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 234, 946–950.

11.

Connolly, M. L. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1983, 16, 548.

12.

Lee, B.; Richards, F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 1971, 55, 379–400.

13.

Zhu, K.; Day, T. Ab initio structure prediction of the antibody hypervariable H3 loop. Proteins, 2013, 81, 1081.

14.

Conchillo-Sole, O.; de Groot, N. S.;. Avilés, F. X.; Vendrell, J.; Daura, X.; Ventura, S. AGGRESCAN: a server for the prediction and evaluation of "hot spots” of aggregation in polypeptides. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 65.

15.

Pawar, A. P.; DuBay, K. F.; Zurdo, J.; Chiti, F.; Vendruscolo, M.; Dobson, C. M. Prediction of 'Aggregation-prone' and 'Aggregation-susceptible' Regions in Proteins Associated with Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 350, 379–392.

16.

Michalsky, E.; Goede, A.; Preissner, R. Loops In Proteins (LIP)—a comprehensive loop database for homology modelling. Protein. Eng. 2003, 16, 979–985.

17.

Dima Kozakov, D.; Hall, D. R.; Xia, B.; Porter, K. A.; Padhorny, D.; Yueh, C.; Beglov, D.; Vajda, S. The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking. Nature Protocols 2017, 12, 255–278.

18.

Sankar, K.; Trainor, K.; Blazer, L. L.; Adams, J. J.; Sidhu, S. S.; Day, T.; Meiering, E.; Maier J. K. X. A Descriptor set for Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Prediction in Biologics. Mol. Inf., 2022, accepted. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.202100240

19.

Mishra A, Ranganathan S, Jayaram B, Sattar A. Role of solvent accessibility for aggregation-prone patches in protein folding. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8