Materials Science References

1. Halgren, T. A.; Lipscomb, W. N. The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 49, 225.
2. Coropceanu,V.; Cornil, J.; da Silva Filho, D. A.; Olivier, Y.; Silbey, R.; Brédas, J.-L. Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 926.
3. Truhlar, D. G.; Cramer, C. J; Lewis, A.; Bumpus, J. A. Molecular Modeling of Environmentally Important Processes: Reduction Potentials. J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81, 596.
4. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction. J. Comp. Chem.2006, 27, 1787.
5. Barone, V.; Casarin, M.; Forrer, D.; Pavone, M.; Sambi, M.; Vittadini, A. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 934.
6. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys.2010, 132, 154104.
7. Tkatchenko, A.; Scheffler, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 073005.
8. Becke, A. D.; Johnson, E. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 154108.
9. Otero de la Roza, A.; Johnson, E. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 174109.
10. Blöchl, P. E.; Jepsen, O.; Andersen, O. K. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 16223.
11. Kawamura, M.; Gohda, Y.; Tsuneyuki, S. Phys. Rev. B 2014 89, 094515.
12. Methfessel, M.; Paxton A. T. Phys. Rev. B 1989, 40, 3616.
13. Marzari, N.; Vanderbilt, D.; de Vita, A.; Payne, M. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 3296.
14. Garrity, K. F.; Bennett, J. W.; Rabe, K. M.; Vanderbilt, D. Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations. Comp. Mat. Sci. 2014, 81, 446.
15. Marrink, S. J.; Risselada, H. J.; Yefimov, S.; Tieleman, D. P.; de Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 7812.
16. Evans, D. R.; Kwak, H. S.; Giesen, D. J.; Goldberg, A.; Halls M. D.; Oh-e M., Estimation of charge carrier mobility in amorphous organic materials using percolation corrected random-walk model. Organic Electronics 2016, 29, 50.
17. Friederich, P.; Symalla, F.; Meded, V.; Neumann, T.; Wenzel, W. Ab Initio Treatment of Disorder Effects in Amorphous Organic Materials: Toward Parameter Free Materials Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 3720.
18. Patrone, P. N.; Dienstfrey, A.; Browning, A. R.; Tucker, S.; Christensen, S. Uncertainty Quantification in Molecular Dynamics Studies of the Glass Transition Temperature. Polymer, 2016, 87, 246. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.074
19. Auhl, R.; Everaers, R.; Grest, G. S.; Kremer, K.; Plimpton, S. J. Equilibration of long chain polymer melts in computer simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 12718. DOI: 10.1063/1.1628670.
20. Mondal, A.; Paterson, L.; Cho, J.; Lin, K-H.; Zee, B.; Wetzelaer, G-J.; Stankevych, A.; Vakhnin, A.; Kim, J-J.; Kadashchuk, A.; Blom, P.W.M.; May, F. Andrienko, D. Molecular library of OLED host materials—Evaluating the multiscale simulation workflow. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2021, 2, 031304. DOI: 10.1063/5.0049513.
21. Andrienko, D. Multiscale Concepts in Simulations of Organic Semiconductors. Handbook of Materials Modeling Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42913-7_39-1.
22. Kotadiya, N. B.; Mondal, A.; Xiong, S.; Blom, P.W.M.; Andrienko, D.; Wetzelaer G-J. Rigorous Characterization and Predictive Modeling of Hole Transport in Amorphous Organic Semiconductors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1800366. DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201800366.
23. Kotadiya, N.B.; Mondal, A.; Blom, P.W.M.; Andrienko, D.; Wetzelaer G-J. A window to trap-free charge transport in organic semiconducting thin films. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1182. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0473-6.
24. Kotadiya, N.B.; Lu, H.; Mondal, A.; Ie, Y.; Andrienko, D.; Blom, P.W.M.; Wetzelaer G-J. Universal strategy for Ohmic hole injection into organic semiconductors with high ionization energies. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 329. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-018-0022-8.
25. Ruehle, V.; Lukyanov, A.; May, F.; Schrader, M.; Vehoff, T.; Kirkpatrick, J.; Baumeier B.; Andrienko, D. Microscopic simulations of charge transport in disordered organic semiconductors. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2011, 7, 3335. DOI: 10.1021/ct200388s.
26. Lukyanov, A.; Andrienko, D. Extracting nondispersive charge carrier mobilities of organic semiconductors from simulations of small systems. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 193202. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.193202.
27. Martínez, L.; Andrade, R.; Birgin, E. G.; Martínez, J. M. Packmol: A package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 2009, 30, 2157.
28. Martínez, J. M.; Martínez, L. Packing optimization for automated generation of complex system's initial configurations for molecular dynamics and docking. J. Comp. Chem. 2003, 24, 819.
29. Shin, H.; Pascal, T. A.; Goddard, W. A., III; Kim, H. Scaled Effective Solvent Method for Predicting the Equilibrium Ensemble of Structures with Analysis of Thermodynamic Properties of Amorphous Polyethylene Glycol−Water Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 916.
30. Sendek, A. D.; Yang, Q.; Cubuk, E. D.; Duerloo, K-A. N.; Cui, Y.; Reed, E. J. Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12 000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials, Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, DOI: 10.1039/c6ee02697d.
31. Beste, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 493, 200.
32. Ward, L.; Dunn, A.; Faghaninia, A.; Zimmermann, N. E. R.; Bajaj, S.; Wang, Q.; Montoya, J. H.; Chen, J.; Bystrom, K.; Dylla, M.; Chard, K.; Asta, M.; Persson, K.; Snyder, G. J.; Foster, I.; Jain, A. Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018.
33. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman N.; Dixon J.S.; Venkataraghavan R. Topological Torsion: A New Molecular Descriptor for SAR Applications. Comparison with Other Desciptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 1987, DOI: 10.1021/ci00054a008.
34. Fu, C. -L.; Ho, K. -M. First-principles calculation of the equilibrium ground-state properties of transition metals: Applications to Nb and Mo. Phys. Rev. B 1983, 28, 5480.
35. Birch, F. Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Phys. Rev. 1947, 71, 809.
36. Hebbache, M.; Zemzemi, M. Ab initio study of high-pressure behavior of a low compressibility metal and a hard material: Osmium and diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 224107.
37. Poirier, J. -P.;Tarantola, A. A logarithmic equation of state. Phys. Earth Planetary Interiors 1998, 109, 1.
38. Lejaeghere, K.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Van Oost, G.; Cottenier, S. Error Estimates for Solid-State Density-Functional Theory Predictions: An Overview by Means of the Ground-State Elemental Crystals. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 2014, 39, 1.
39. Wellendorff, J.; Lundgaard, K. T.; Møgelhøj, A.; Petzold, V.; Landis, D. D.; Nørskov, J. K.; Bligaard, T.; Jacobsen, K. Density functionals for surface science: Exchange-correlation model development with Bayesian error estimation. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 235149, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.235149.
40. Reimers, J.; Wilson, K. Complex time dependent wave packet technique for thermal equilibrium systems: Electronic spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 4749, DOI: 10.1063/1.445618.
41. Avila Ferrer, F.; , Santoro, F. Comparison of vertical and adiabatic harmonic approaches for the calculation of the vibrational structure of electronic spectra. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 13549, DOI: 10.1039/C2CP41169E.
42. Campbell, C. T.; Sellers, J. R. V. The Entropies of Adsorbed Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 18109, DOI: 10.1021/ja3080117.
43. Budi, A.; Stipp, S. L. S.; Andersson, M. P. Calculation of Entropy of Adsorption for Small Molecules on Mineral Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 8236, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11860.
44. Rzepa, C.; Siderius, D. W.; Hatch, H. W.; Shen, V. K.; Rangarajan, S.; Mittal, J. Computational Investigation of Correlations in Adsorbate Entropy for Pure-Silica Zeolite Adsorbents. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 16350, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02671.
45. Himanen, L.; Jäger, M. O. J.; Morooka, E. V.; Canova, F. F.; Ranawat, Y. S.; Gao, D. Z.; Rinke, P.; Foster, A. S. DScribe: Library of descriptors for machine learning in materials science. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2020, 247, 106949, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106949.
46. Mai, S.; Plasser, F.; Dorn, J.; Fumanal, M.; Daniel, C.; González, L. Quantitative wave function analysis for excited states of transition metalcomplexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 361, 74, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.01.019.
47. Stein, T.; Autschbach, J.; Govind, N.; Kronik, L.; Baer, R. Curvature and Frontier Orbital Energies in Density Functional Theory. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 3740, DOI: 10.1021/jz3015937.
48. Smidstrup, S.; Pedersen, A.; Stokbro, K.; Jónsson, H. Improved initial guess for minimum energy path calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 214106. DOI: 10.1063/1.4878664.
49. Panoukidou, M.; Wand, C. R.; Carbone, P. Comparison of equilibrium techniques for the viscosity calculation from DPD simulations. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 8343. DOI: 10.1039/d1sm00891a.
50. Mills, G.; Jónsson, H. Quantum and thermal effects in H2 dissociative adsorption: Evaluation of free energy barriers in multidimensional quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 72, 1124. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1124.
51. Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9978. DOI: 10.1063/1.1323224.
52. Kolsbjerg, E. L.; Groves, M.N.; Hammer, B. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 09407. DOI: 10.1063/1.4961868.
53. Makri, S.; Ortner, C.; Kermode, J. R. A preconditioning scheme for minimum energy path finding methods. J. Chem. Phys.2019, 150, 094109. DOI: 10.1063/1.5064465.
54. Vecharynski, E.; Yang, C.; Pask, J.E. A projected preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for computing many extreme eigenpairs of a hermitian matrix. J. Comput. Phys. 2015, 290, 73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.02.030.
55. Pan, Y.; Dai, X.; de Gironcoli, S.; Gong, X.-G.; Rignanese, G.-M.; Zhou, A. A parallel orbital-updating based plane-wave basis method for electronic structure calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 2017, 348, 482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.033.
56. Sun, W.; Ceder, G., A. Efficient creation and convergence of surface slabs. Surf. Sci. 2013, 617, 482. DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2013.05.016.
57. Chew, A. K.; Sender, M.; Kaplan, Z.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Browning, A. R.; Kwak, H. S.; Halls, M. D.; Afzal, A. F. Advancing Material Property Prediction: Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning Models for Viscosity. DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-1qfw8-v2.
58. Grimme, Stefan. Exploration of Chemical Compound, Conformer, and Reaction Space with Meta-Dynamics Simulations Based on Tight-Binding Quantum Chemical Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 2847. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00143.
59. Mohanty, S.; Stevenson, J.; Browning, A.R.; et al. Development of scalable and generalizable machine learned force field for polymers. Sci Rep 2023, 13, 17251. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43804-5.
60. Müller-Plathe, F. A simple nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method for calculating the thermal conductivity. J. Chem. Phys.1997, 106, 6082. DOI: 10.1063/1.473271.
61. Zhang, M.; Lussetti, E.; E. S. de Souza, L.; Müller-Plathe, F. Thermal Conductivities of Molecular Liquids by Reverse Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 15060. DOI: 10.1021/jp0512255.
62. Cahill, D. G.; Ford, W. K.; Goodson, K. E.; Mahan, G. D.; Majumdar, A.; Maris, H. J.; Merlin, R.; Phillpot, S. R. Nanoscale thermal transport. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 793. DOI: 10.1063/1.1524305.
63. Bedoya-Martínez, O. N. ; Barrat, J-L.; Rodney, D.Computation of the thermal conductivity using methods based on classical and quantum molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 014303. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.014303.
64. Krishnamoorthy, A.; Rajak, P.; Norouzzadeh, P.; Singh, D. J.; Kalia, R. K.; Nakano, A.; Vashishta, P. Thermal conductivity of MoS2 monolayers from molecular dynamics simulations. AIP Advances 2019, 9, 035042. DOI: 10.1063/1.5085336.
65. Sorkun, M.C., Khetan, A. & Er, S. AqSolDB, a curated reference set of aqueous solubility and 2D descriptors for a diverse set of compounds. Sci Data 2019, 6, 143. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0151-1..
66. Gao, P., Andersen, A., Sepulveda, J. et al. SOMAS: a platform for data-driven material discovery in redox flow battery development. Sci Data 2022, 9, 740. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01814-4.
67. CRC Handbook of Physics and Chemistry 103rd edition
68. Joung, J.F., Han, M., Jeong, M. et al. Experimental database of optical properties of organic compounds. Sci Data 2020, 7, 295. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00634-8.
69. Bicerano, J. Prediction of Polymer Properties (3rd ed.). CRC Press 2002. DOI: 10.1201/9780203910115.
70. Afzal, A. F., Browning, A., Goldberg, A., Halls, M. D. et al. High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Validation of Thermophysical Properties of Polymers for Various Applications. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater.2021, 3, 620. DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.0c00524.
71. Stull, D.R. Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances. Organic and Inorganic Compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1947, 39, 517. DOI: 10.1021/ie50448a022.
72. Li, C.; Harrison, A. K.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zeng, C.; Dias, F. B.; Ren, Z.; Yan, S.; Bryce, M. R. Asymmetrical‐Dendronized TADF Emitters for Efficient Non‐doped Solution‐Processed OLEDs by Eliminating Degenerate Excited States and Creating Solely Thermal Equilibrium Routes. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134. DOI: 10.1002/ange.202115140.
73. Xiao, Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, Z.; Shen, M.; Huang, R.; Miao, Y.; Liu, G.; Yu, T.; Huang, W. NIR TADF Emitters and OLEDs: Challenges, Progress, and Perspectives. Chem Sci 2022, 13, 8906. DOI: 10.1039/d2sc02201j.
74. Qin, Y.; Li, G.; Qi, T.; Huang, H. Aromatic Imide/Amide-Based Organic Small-Molecule Emitters for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 1554. DOI: 10.1039/d0qm00084a.
75. Teng, J.-M.; Wang, Y.-F.; Chen, C.-F. Recent Progress of Narrowband TADF Emitters and Their Applications in OLEDs. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 11340. DOI: 10.1039/d0tc02682d.
76. Konidena, R. K.; Naveen, K. R. Boron‐Based Narrowband Multiresonance Delayed Fluorescent Emitters for Organic Light‐Emitting Diodes. Advanced Photonics Research 2022, 3. DOI: 10.1002/adpr.202200201.
77. Wong, M. Y.; Zysman‐Colman, E. Purely Organic Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Materials for Organic Light‐Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201605444.
78. Han, J.; Huang, Z.; Miao, J.; Qiu, Y.; Xie, Z.; Yang, C. Narrowband Blue Emission with Insensitivity to the Doping Concentration from an Oxygen-Bridged Triarylboron-Based TADF Emitter: Nondoped OLEDs with a High External Quantum Efficiency up to 21.4%. Chem. Sci.2022, 13, 3402. DOI: 10.1039/d2sc00329e.
79. Bas, E. E.; Ulukan, P.; Monari, A.; Aviyente, V.; Catak, S. Photophysical Properties of Benzophenone-Based TADF Emitters in Relation to Their Molecular Structure. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 473. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08320.
80. Noda, H.; Chen, X.-K.; Nakanotani, H.; Hosokai, T.; Miyajima, M.; Notsuka, N.; Kashima, Y.; Brédas, J.-L.; Adachi, C. Critical Role of Intermediate Electronic States for Spin-Flip Processes in Charge-Transfer-Type Organic Molecules with Multiple Donors and Acceptors. Nature Materials 2019, 18, 1084. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0465-6.
81. Ossila Ltd.; TADF Materials; Ossila Ltd.: Sheffield, 2024; https://www.ossila.com/collections/tadf-materials
82. Luminescence Technology Corp.; Materials; Luminescence Technology Corp.: New Taipei City, 2024; https://lumtec.com.tw/products-list.php#Materials
83. Krasnov, L.; Mikhaylov, S.; Fedorov, M.V.; Sosnin, S. BigSolDB: solubility dataset of substances in organic solvents and water in a wide range of temperatures. Zenodo 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6984601.
84. Bradley, J-C.; Williams, A.; Lang, A. Jean-Claude Bradley Open Melting Point Dataset. figshare 2014. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1031637.v2.
85. Freysoldt, C.; Neugebauer, J.; Van de Walle, C. Fully Ab Initio Finite-Size Corrections for Charged-Defect Supercell Calculations. PRL2009, 102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.016402.
86. Freysoldt, C.; Neugebauer, J.; Van de Walle, C. Electrostatic interactions between charged defects in supercells. Phys. Status Solidi B2011, 248, 1067. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201046289.
87. Zhou, D.; Bier, I.; Santra, B.; et al. A robust crystal structure prediction method to support small molecule drug development with large scale validation and blind study. Nat Commun2025, 16, 2210. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57479-1.
88. Koerstz, M.; Rasmussen, M.H.; Jensen, J.H. Fast and automated identification of reactions with low barriers: the decomposition of 3-hydroperoxypropanal. SciPostChem2021, 1, 003. DOI: 10.21468/SciPostChem.1.1.003.
89. Rasmussen, M.H.; Jensen, J.H. Fast and automated identification of reactions with low barriers using meta-MD simulations. PeerJ phys. chem.2022, 4, e22. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-pchem.22.
90. Krishna, R.; van Baten, J.M. The Darken Relation for Multicomponent Diffusion in Liquid Mixtures of Linear Alkanes:  An Investigation Using Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2005, 44, 6939. DOI: 10.1021/ie050146c.
91. Wheeler, D.R.; Newman, J. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Multicomponent Diffusion. 1. Equilibrium Method. J. Phys. Chem. B2004, 108, 18353. DOI: 10.1021/jp047850b.
92. Mistry, A.; Yu, Z.; Srinivasan, V. On Relative Importance of Vehicular and Structural Motions in Defining Electrolyte Transport. J. Electrochem. Soc.2023, 170, 110536. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ad0c66.