flowchart TD
        step_Computational_Target_Analysis["Computational Target Analysis"]
        step_Prerequisites_and_preliminary_steps("Prerequisites and preliminary steps")
        step_Assessing_overall_structure_quality("Assessing overall structure quality")
        step_Work_with_static_structures_or_use_molecular_dynamics{{"Work with static structures or use molecular dynamics?"}}
        step_Analyzing_static_structures("Analyzing static structures")
        step_In_depth_analysis_using_MD_methods("In-depth analysis using MD methods")
        step_Conclusion_and_Next_Steps("Conclusion and Next Steps")
    
        step_Computational_Target_Analysis --> step_Prerequisites_and_preliminary_steps
        step_Prerequisites_and_preliminary_steps --> step_Assessing_overall_structure_quality
        step_Assessing_overall_structure_quality --> step_Work_with_static_structures_or_use_molecular_dynamics
        step_Work_with_static_structures_or_use_molecular_dynamics --> |"Analyze a static structure"| step_Analyzing_static_structures
        step_Work_with_static_structures_or_use_molecular_dynamics --> |"Use molecular dynamics"| step_In_depth_analysis_using_MD_methods


        step_Analyzing_static_structures --> step_Conclusion_and_Next_Steps
        step_In_depth_analysis_using_MD_methods --> step_Conclusion_and_Next_Steps

        classDef path_title stroke-width:2px,fill:#12122c,stroke:#12122c
        classDef decision_step stroke-width:2px,fill:#005aaa,stroke:#005aaa
        classDef simple_step stroke-width:2px,fill:#12122c,stroke:#12122c
        class step_Computational_Target_Analysis path_title
        class step_Prerequisites_and_preliminary_steps,step_Assessing_overall_structure_quality,step_Analyzing_static_structures,step_In_depth_analysis_using_MD_methods,step_Conclusion_and_Next_Steps simple_step
        class step_Work_with_static_structures_or_use_molecular_dynamics decision_step
    

Learning Path: Computational Target Analysis

Target analysis is the process of collecting and evaluating all available information concerning a drug discovery target, e.g. its natural occurrence in an organism, its role in biochemical pathways, structure, function, natural variability, known binders or tool compounds, etc. The goal of this stage is to establish a strong understanding of the target which will inform decisions during later stages of a project. While many aspects of this process consist of literature research, computational methods expand the toolbox with which to establish or probe these properties.

Target enablement, preparation, and validation
Enabling protein structures from x-ray crystallography, cryo-EM, ML-methods, and homology modeling for structure-based computational workflows

Prerequisites and preliminary steps

Most methods for computational target analysis require a structure of the target. The more structural information is available, the better (e.g. target bound to various chemical matter as well as apo structures). If no experimentally determined structure is available, structure prediction methods can be used to obtain a usable structure. Ligand-based methods for computational target analysis are very indirect and are not covered here.

Computational Structure Prediction
See here for what to do if you don't have a structure.

Assessing overall structure quality

Irrespective where it came from, a structural model can have issues which if left unfixed can adversely impact further calculations. This step usually happens as part of system preparation and is tightly interleaved with it. A variety of tools in the Schrödinger suite can help identify and resolve potential issues. Knowledge and understanding of the system and its biochemistry is essential in this step.

Preparing Nucleic Acid Structures
highlights the particulars for preparing DNA/RNA
Protein Reliability Report
Common structure quality checks
Protein Preparation Workflow Quick Reference Sheet

Decide: Work with static structures or use molecular dynamics?

This is not an either-or decision: Making use of both types of methods is helpful.

Understanding and Visualizing Target Flexibility
A few aproaches for identifying flexible regions of a target.

Analyzing static structures

From a single or multiple structures you can get a quick overview of the system and estimate available space. However, this approach is inherently limited by the artificial rigidity imposed on the system.

Target Analysis with SiteMap and WaterMap
SiteMap is an efficient method for finding and characterizing binding sites from static structure.
Liability Analysis for Biologics
Protein surface analysis tools useful beyond Biologics applications
Analyzing Binding Sites of Nucleic Acids with SiteMap The scoring function in SiteMap has been recalibrated for improved RNA support.

In-depth analysis using MD methods

MD methods are more computationally costly, but can accurately capture the dynamics of the system and can be used to answer a variety of questions about both the quality of the computational model and the system's behavior in its natural environment. They can be particularly valuable for identifying cryptic or transient binding sites.

Target Analysis with SiteMap and WaterMap
WaterMap uses MD simulations to elucidate hydration patterns in binding pockets.
In silico cryptic binding site detection and prioritization webinar giving an introduction to mixed-solvent molecular dynamics.

Conclusion and Next Steps

You have done the preliminary work necessary to take stock of the available structural data, understand its pitfalls and limitations and prepare it for modeling. You have analyzed the static structural model to identify key features of the system and/or run MD simulations to understand the dynamics of the system, e.g. the flexibility the protein environment or hydration patterns in a binding pocket. Now, you are ready to use the available structures to answer design questions. Note that it's possible to go back to the tools presented in this stage and re-run them after new information becomes available in a project.

Virtual Screening Learning Path